Monday, August 13, 2007
Thursday, August 09, 2007
Monday, August 06, 2007
No more posts for awhile

Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Radio tag built into clothing.
Since there was usually someone different at the door it was getting to be a pain in the butt as I had to empty my pockets etc, etc. to make sure I was not stealing anything. As much of a pain as it was I just thought it was something in me. even joking about alien implants..lol.
Well yesterday after mentioning it to one of the employees there for the hundredth time we endded up using one of their scanners on every part of my body and clothing. I had removed the security tags long ago but lo and behold I and the teller missed one. It was behind the tag and under two layers of cloth. The only way it could get there was in the making of the jacket. And why was it not doing anything for the first couple months? I understand the tags placed there for security but why place it where it can not be removed? Or even known about by staff? I bent the heck out of it and I no longer set the alarms off. I could not remove it without cutting up the coat and I still need it.
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
More high altitude spraying?




Thursday, June 21, 2007
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Alien spaceship passes overhead


Odd light seen while fishing. Moving South to North, steady speed, no sound. Never mentioned it to the other two guys in the boat as they were busy catching fish and have no interest in these things. I've seen so many it's hard to get excited anymore. OK maybe it isn't an alien spaceship but it is not an airplane or satellite either. It's not landing lights or a large (very large) glowing bug. It's not a balloon or Thia lantern. Ball lightning doesn't explain it, nor does swamp gas. Venus...lol, right.
Tell me the most stupid thing you think it is and win a government job!
Kidding, no job promised or implyed.
Monday, June 11, 2007
What a fun Monday.


Saturday, June 09, 2007
The Jenny flies!
Friday, May 25, 2007
Odd light crosses city.


I was walking home when I looked up and saw this bright object slowly making it's way across the city. It was round and seemed to be reflecting the light rather than being white. then it just up and left. It was rather high up as this picture was taken at 22x. Two guys setting up for the carnival also saw it but didn't seem that interested. It's movement was steady and did not look like it was being blown around. www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVGrZtfAk6M when zoomed in on the object it shows distortion around it. With my polorized sunglasses off I could not see it at the height it was at.
Labels: ufo
Friday, May 18, 2007
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
New R/C takes to the sky.

Well I added another toy to my fleet and this one is a hoot to fly! On the UFO front I heard of a local sighting that was seen by 3 and as many as 6 people that involved a huge triange at the local lookout over the Peace River. This happened a couple of months ago and I have no other information about it.Monday, May 14, 2007
Saturday, May 12, 2007
I'm back!!




Well spring is here and a new season for UFO sightings is about to begin. The last month was spent flying some of my many R/C aircraft which at last count is around 40+ with 4 more coming next week. I know have all the rigging to mount my camcorder to my spotting scope and do some long range clear and in focus video taping. As it is I have been mounting the camera on a tripod and hooking it up to my projector and watching the moon go by in real time on a 90 inch screen..looks great on high zoom.
Sunday, April 01, 2007
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Orb light trail - update.

Orb light trail

Thursday, March 01, 2007
Could Orbs be real living things.


I was reading another article about orbs yesterday in which the author tries hard to get people to believe they are nothing more than camera or lens problems or a trick of light. Now I'm not going to mention his name or the article title because people don't need that garbage going into their heads. Having said that I must say that I still am not convinced that these "things" are no more than some form of life, be it insect or otherwise, that we have yet to identify. Any, and I mean any, time you read an article or see a story about orbs on T.V. and the person said they are tricks of the camera you can be assured that they have NEVER tried to study them in real time and are just giving their own opinion based on some footage they were shown. In the last two months I have watched and filmed these orbs for almost 300 hours and I have seen them play with my cat, chase each other and go into and out of walls and other objects with ease. To say they are dust blown by air currents, again, is the opinion of someone who has never looked at this themselves or an opinion based in fear.
How can dust cast it's own light? I've seen dust in the air and it just floats there never moving with much speed or suddenly changing direction while the other dust particles continue to move in the other direction. Dust is quite small while orbs can be rather large with 3-4 inchs being the largest I've seen of the round ones. The ribbon types seem to be about 5-8 inchs and dance like a feather on a breeze, but without the breeze. I've lite candles to show if there are any air currents around while hanging strips of paper to also show air movement. Orbs zip back and forth, up and down while the candles and paper were unmoved. They can go from a stand still to moving faster than the eye can follow in a split second while doing 90 degree turns.
Unlike Rods, Orbs can be watched by anyone with a camcorder that has some sort of nightshot infrared on it. Although they can be seen with normal cameras it is harder as they tend to blend in with the surrounding light. Orbs are around 24/7/365 but the darker the better as their light is quite dim. You don't need a graveyard or haunted house, just sit in your livingroom with the lights out and camera rolling.
My computer desk and T.V. have dust on them a lot as that's just the way it is in this town. How come only a few orbs show up at a time? What about the millions of dust particles floating through the air at any given time? Even if they have to turn just right to "glow" for the camera wouldn't many others also? I'm asking these questions to make you, the reader, think, not to convince myself of anything. I know they are alive. I just don't know what they are.
Monday, February 26, 2007
Graveyard Snowman





Not much happening, strange wise anyway, so I've been out flying, watching the Snowbirds do a few passes, even an icefishing trip or two. At least I'm getting out. I've been getting quite a lot of orb footage, some of which I've posted on youtube. Since going with this new blogger I can't add videos to the site. Is it just me or am I missing something? After filming some of my R/C flights, buddy puts the camcorder on the dash of his truck while it was still on record. No big deal but when we watched the days flight footage he noticed the "man" buried in the snowbank. The funny part is that right on the other side of that snowbank are about 100+ graves in the city center grave yard. Less than 24 hours till I find out what the insurance company is going to do about my settelment. No use worrying about it as it will be what it will be and I'll go from there. They've been ok so far so it will be fair or get the lawyer time, whatever, it's not the first time I've had to sell everything and start over and I'm sure it's not going to be the last. The only constant is change.
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Orb casts it's own light.


Sunday, February 11, 2007
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Friday, February 09, 2007
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
Saturday, February 03, 2007
Thursday, January 25, 2007
I see dead people
OK this one I had to share. At around 4:00 this morning I wake up and have an urge to grab the camcorder which is never more than a foot away and as I grab it I see my orb detector ( the cat ) looking at something so I swing the camera around and this is what I got. It's not dust or on a string. I'd be glad to email it to anyone who has a program that may show it better. I think I might go to the local cemetary tonight and see what I get. I even saw one go across the floor like a dolphin goes through the water...up through the floor then down through the floor...up, down, up, down all the way across the room. When I download the footage to the computer it is darker than what I see through the lens. And no I do not think these things are ghosts. I could be wrong but for now I think they may be more related to rods than anything else. This one was no more than 2 feet from the camera.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
orbs
I don't know whats so rare about these things as I can video tape them by the hundreds. I've seen them go through my tv and out the other side. I've seen them stop and turn 90 degrees and cross each other. They are so common that I no longer waste tape on them I just use the camcorder to watch them. Even my cat watches them. These objects are about 2 to 3 inchs in size and no more than 3 to 4 feet from the camera. I mean if these things are ghosts then I have one heck of a haunted house. They do seem to move in a way that looks alive and by that I mean they move with purpose. Anyone who says they are dust paticles has never looked at them with their own eyes. Maybe they are related to rods?
Thursday, January 18, 2007
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Practicality of Joseph Newman's Energy Machine
| Now see the energy of the future that does away with pollution and energy costs. It is running a classic '71 MG Convertible with no gas. | |
O'Hare Leaked News Broadcast Footage
| The following video was leaked from a News room, showing unedited discussion of the Chicago O'Hare Airport UFO case among news broadcasters. For the latest news on this case and other worldwide extraterrestrial activity, visit www.alienvideo.net | |
Saturday, January 13, 2007
Helicopter with light ver.2




If the lighted ball/orb following this helicopter was a snowflake, it's a big one. For snow ( it was not snowing that Sept. day ) to only be seen clearly by zooming in on the picture means that it was not close to the lens and if not then it must be quite large. The rescue helo. is not exactly small and was perhaps a little under a quarter mile away ( I was using the zoom but not above 2.5x optical ) and at an altitude of under 1000ft.. It appeared to be to the right and a little behind the helo.. Did they know it was there? I'm not sure, they flew by at a steady speed with no deviation in heading.
I have 5 photos of the helicopter as it passed by, 4 with the object in them which represents aprox. 45 seconds in time. While I don't remember it being a windy day if it was a balloon then the wash of the helicopter over that time would have moved it quite far away in one direction or another, would it not?
I'd put it at the size of one of those orbs seen moving in the cropcircle footage. These things are rather common and seem to move in a controlled manner. Maybe some footage using a hi def camcorder would help clear up the images. Donations welcome, LOL.
Thursday, January 11, 2007
Blah blah blah

I was wondering if anyone out there could tell me why not one of my video tapes that I have sent out has made it to it's intended recipients? Not one. Even the piece of fossil I sent to be analyzed never made it through the mail, which is really too bad as I'm quite interested in what it is. As for my UFO footage it would be nice to know what they are or aren't, but as this is more a personal quest for the truth if the government or whoever wants the tapes so bad they can have them.
I only put my sightings here to share with others who might be looking for answers about what they have seen so they may know they are not alone. Most of the e-mail I receive is positive but some is not. If I've said it once I've said it a thousand times...it's ok to be skeptical but not stupid. Think before you write. If I live in Northern Canada and it's January then what are the chances that what I see and getting on film are bugs? How many weather balloons are released in minus 35 degree temperatures? How many satellites have you seen in the middle of a bright sunny day? If the object is moving away from you how could it be aircraft landing lights? Exactly how many silent helicopters are there out there? That fly around without the proper lights? What is the Military doing testing such obvious highly powered test aircraft over populated areas? In broad daylight? Just how many times can one mistake what he or she is seeing for owls? If the camcorder is on a tripod and not moving and an object passes by how can it be a planet? At 1:30 in the afternoon!
I have heard everyone of these excuses as to why what I'm seeing could not possibly be what I think they are. I'm not going to try and convince anyone of this but I know that not one of my photos is a plane or satellite or bird. I use star charts to check where everything is before going out and by using all equipment on it's highest shutter settings I can eliminate all bugs or birds.
I'd like to say I'm sorry if these photos cause you to become upset about your world view being unraveled but then I'd be lieing. I could care less! If your mind is so shut that talk of this subject upsets you then may I offer you a drink of koolaid? Cherry flavor I think. You'll only need one cup. Not thirsty? The oven is over there...feel free to put your head inside.
I'm just getting tired of being polite to those who refuse to put any thought into what they say. Have you noticed that the mainline skeptics out there remain silent when there are photographs involved? Not always of course but mostly. Gee I wonder why?
Do most of the well known UFO investigators who have never had a sighting themselves continue to get airtime because they continue to spout the line that what most are seeing are mistaken identifications? Do they know that if they say what they really believe the gravy train will end? When is it time to stop playing this media game?
Saturday, January 06, 2007
Camera captures another UFO


Ok, the smaller dark things are snow flakes but what the heck is that? Not a snow flake that's for sure. It's not a type of bird I've ever seen. If you know what type of plane it is then tell me. Maybe it's a really, really low satellite, or space junk passing by at a steady pace while making no noise. It could be a funny looking balloon that moves in a way that goes against the wind. Maybe the camera was seeing things and is a little crazy. My what a funny looking Frisbee or hubcap.It appears to be around 200-300 feet up and if so then it might be 10 feet or so in size. I'm sure I've seen this shape in another UFO photo somewhere on-line but can't seem to find it anywhere. For those that are interested I always use my camera on it's highest shutter speed (sport) to catch as little blur as possible. This setting captures bugs and birds clearly as to rule out these sort of things.
Thursday, January 04, 2007
UFO ?



I took this random photo out at the dump today around 1:30pm. The bottom picture is the original and the middle one is with enhancements of course. In the right lower side you can see a raven but above and to the left center is something else. Too windy and cold to be a bug. As I did not see it at the time I can't tell the size but it appears to be disc or cylinder shaped. The top photo was also taken at the same time ( within a few seconds ) and shows that it was not a smear on the lens.
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
On going public

Imagine waking up one morning and going to your local store to buy a paper and finding your sighting on the front page. I'm just glad they didn't include a photo of myself. This article cost me a promotion at work and a couple of friends but you know what? I don't care. The business I was working for closed due to poor management and I've made many new friends since then. But man, what a ride! When the article first came out I went to various stores to buy a copy and ask what the sellers thought about it ( they did not know it was me in the story ). The first thing they said was it was selling a lot of papers but their comments after that ranged from "he should be committed" to " I don't want to talk about it, it freaks me out" and everything in between. A few even related a few sightings of their own.
If you read the story there are many mistakes and sentences taken from one conversation and mixed with others to give a different slant on what was really said. This seems to be the way media works and I've since learned my lessons when it comes to giving interviews.
Since that story ran I've managed to capture many other objects on both still and video camera's and am no longer amazed when I see another object that someone has on film from somewhere else that matches those I've taken. It really is a small world.
I cannot be embarrassed or made to feel like an outcast because of this topic. These things are real and I'll stand up anywhere and say so. If I'm not taken seriously because I have no degree or do not fly an airplane or I'm not a great upstanding citizen in the community so be it ( I have no record and have been in the security field a few times ).
And what does being a pilot have to do with being taken more seriously anyway? I've built and flown an ultralight Goldwing and I have known a few people who flew that I would not trust with anything I owned.
The cap of silence in the press on the subject of UFO sightings in the US and Canada must end. The Governments must stop fearing the peoples reaction to reality and come clean. If the religious people fear the truth, well so be it. Dogma is bad for the soul.
While it is too cold for the camcorder to be used outside I still never go anywhere without my camera as these things show up at anytime, anywhere. Weather phenomena my A**. I mean come on that went out with swamp gas. Some day the children who now run our countries will be forced to come clean and the longer they wait the worse for them it will be.
Having said my little rant I have to say that if you see something please report it as soon as possible. Your name will not be used in public with most good reporting sites and you never have to go through what I did.
Sunday, December 31, 2006
No more UFO magazine
Saturday, December 30, 2006
I am not a UFO believer

To believe in something implies faith. Does it take faith to know the sun will rise tomorrow or that the sky is blue? Of course not, This is why I always correct those who keep asking me why I believe in UFO's. I know there are UFO's , belief is not required. I know there are UFO's, whatever they are, and those who strive to argue in a public way that they are just peoples imaginations or weather should be treated like those long ago who thought the world was flat and would burn those who did not as heretics. Their agenda and their employers should be and will be very shortly hopefully exposed as the frauds and enemies of mankind that they are. They do not serve to better mankind but to keep us ignorant and themselves in whatever power they think they have.
How many more have to realize that those so called powers that be are lieing to us before critical mass is reached. There is a great difference between knowing something and believing something. I know "free" energy is real, governments deny it, I know Cancer and other health related problems can be cured using light and sound, the government denies it, I know our government in this country has no constitutional right to charge us income tax ( only the provinces can ), again they deny it, I know that very high mileage engines without power loss are real, yet they deny it, I know that UFO's are as real as the planes above, yet they deny it. For anyone who cares to learn the truth about our world only has to do a little research for themselves. Not just online but get there hands dirty and play with these things. But people are kept busy just trying to earn a living, I know. This is what gives them the power to keep the wool over most peoples eyes. This comes with a warning though as when you do have a pyridine shift you can never go back to your "real" life. All the so called Authorities and institutions start to look ridiculous as you start to listening to what they are telling everyone compared to what you know is real. I'm not talking about putting your own personal take on anything I'm talking about knowing facts here. A fuel injection squirts fuel into the engine. Can anyone argue that statement? No because it is fact and no matter what your religious beliefs are this is still the case. This is what I'm talking about when referring to facts, things that are indisputable no matter what your currant outlook on life is.
I should watch when I use the word "truth" because "truth" is subjective and as they say "one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter". Dry cold hard facts are the only way to deal with what's out there, no politics or B/S required. Thanks to modern tech. the reality of planet Earth is becoming harder and harder for those who think they are in control to contain. It's time for the lies to end.
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Odd object found in photo


While walking home at around 12:15 today I was taking random photos with my digital camera, after checking the skies for planes and birds that may be in the shot, and there are none, Idownloaded the shots to check them out and noticed this odd object. IT IS NOT A PLANE. IT IS NOT A BIRD. I won't report this as a ufo as I did not see it with my eyes at the time.
Thursday, December 14, 2006
North American UFO's
Friday, December 01, 2006
Energy Creation & Free Energy - as applied to a generator

Could our modern engineers be so wrapped up in the complex problems of improving the efficiency of standard machinery that they " cannot see the forest through the tree's "?
It is blind to argue with physical law's, but it is more blind to ignore something that appears to be an exception simply because it violates our known understanding of nature. Was it not once proven scientifically impossible to go to the moon or travel faster than sound?
How does one define energy? Most textbook's state that energy is "the ability to overcome resistance" or " the capacity to do work". Most experts agree that there really is no good definition for energy, yet they allseem to agree that one cannot obtain it from nothing. Nature, however, isfull of examples of free energy. A permanent magnet can exert a force infinitly without consuming energy. Gravity constantly pulls us downwards without consuming energy. Yet these forces pull only in one direction, and have a dead end.
When an object falls it hits the earth and stops moving. The force, however, continues to pull. Is it possible to construct a device, which converts a " dead" unidirectional force into a "live" rotary or oscillating force which can do that which we prceive as work?
Perpetual motion has for cenuries given free energy a bad name. Although perpetual motion and free energy are interrelated, there is an important difference. Perpetual motion is not in itself a form of energy. It is merely the situation which exists when something is set in motion and there is nothing to slow it down. Which brings us to the first rule of free energy - That which appears as one thing in one frame of referance may be perceived quite differently in another.
" Work is something done against a force, not perpendicular to it". To comprehend this, consider this analogy: If one has an iron ball and wishes to change it's location by a certain distance, one of two things could be done. It could be lifted that distance upward, which is work against gravity or one could move the ball horizontally, perpendicular to the force of gravity, which as one would imagine, would require less effort. Thus no work would have been done as moving horizontally is at a right angle to the direction of the force of gravity. This idea of something acting perpendicular to a force will herein be refered to as the " Perpendicular concept". This is also the second rule of free energy.
The standard rule that once an object is set in motion, untill resistance stops it, brings us to the third rule of free energy- inertia. The only energy needed to move the iron ball sideways is just enough to overcome it's inertia to get it rolling which is returned, however, by reabsorbing it when the rolling stops at it's destination. Therefore, it can be stated that no energy needs to be consumed to produce a change in position, as the astronauts did when going to the moon.
Our modern electrical machinery creates a misconception as to what force really does " work". It is not the direct force of the flowing electrons, which produce physical force, but the magnetic fielf that acts like a force. Since no energy is required to produce a change in position, no energy should be required to produce a magnetic field.
To design a free energy machine the forces must reverse polarity periodically. Permanent magnets are a natural free force. But to switch their field polarity without itself doing work has eluded most designers- this can be done by applying rule#2.
There are only two ways to achive free energy using permanent magnets, deflective and distributive. A load put on these forms of generators will not affect the output of said generator because what is happening mechanically is isolated from what is happening electrically.
Lenz's Law states that " an induced electric current flows in a direction such that the current opposes the change that produced it".
Lenz's Law upholds the conventional belief that it takes energy to make energy. Thus the world has excepted the fact that it takes physical force to make electrical force and it takes electrical force to make physical force. If we have a conductor in a magnetic field as before, and we have current flowing, the conductor tries to move. This time, however, we physically prevent the conductor from moving. It is held in place. A force is exerted, but no work is done. The current continues to flow. This may not sound like much but it should. Why should the electrons flow so freely when the output is loaded ininatly? Shouldn't the flow be loaded also? It is not, and sice there is no motion there is is no opposition current to act as electrical resistance to the current flow. Here is a loophole that lies right before our eyes. You may have heard that " a D.C. current flowing through a stationary coil will produce a stationary field around the coil, but a stationary field around a stationary coil will not produce any current flow". The relationship between magnetic field, current flow, and motion may be reversible, but the relationship between current and magnetic field alone is not reversible. The key to free magnetic energy lies in how we deal with the physical motion. As long as the motion produced by the force does not produce resistance to the flow of electrons, Lenz's Law is avoided.
Free energy is produced by a system in which a non-energy concuming unidirectional force is caused to oscillate by means which is not defined as work to the system.
Note: I'm not the author of all this, but the stuff I played with seemed to be interesting.










































